Cases 11 - 20 of 50
HAMMONDS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01389
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN "JOHN DOE" ZEPPO, DEPUTY WARDEN "JOHN DOE" WAINWRIGHT, MAINT. SUPERVISOR AMELIA BENNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN HAMMONDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hammond v. Baltazar
as 3:2018cv01236
Petitioner:
Navarro A Hammond
Respondent:
J. Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHBURG v. HAMMOND
as 1:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
ONDRE RICHBURG
Defendant:
GREGORY HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOND v. KRAK et al
as 2:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND
Defendant:
ROBERT M. KRAK, LOUIS FOLINO, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMOND v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2017cv01885
Plaintiff:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JARRAD P. BERKIHISER and LANCASTER CITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Luzerne County Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv02264
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Luzerne County Division of Corrections , Warden Larson , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMONDS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2016cv03682
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN HAMMONDS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER JOHN DOE, LUZERNE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. HAMMOND et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant:
GREGORY J. HAMMOND , 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA , EVA C. STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. USA
as 1:2015cv02116
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Damien Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hammonds v. PA Dept. of Corr. et al
as 4:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corr., John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
