Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Archie Tindell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-3063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, HARRY WILSON, LINDA HARRIS and others
FLYNN v. WILSON et al
as 3:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FLYNN
Defendant:
HARRY WILSON, DEPUTY SUPT. BURNS, CAPTAIN MANCHAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Fortson v. Donald Kelchner, et al
as 09-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN T. FORTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD KELCHNER, S.C.I. Camp Hill Superintendent, HARRY WILSON, S.C.I. Fayette Superintendent, DANIEL BURNS, S.C.I. Fayette Deputy Superintendent and others
Charles Whitfield, Jr. v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 09-1584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES RUSSELL WHITFIELD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY WILSON, Superintendent, DA BUCKS and ATTY GEN PA
Demetrius Grant v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 09-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS J. GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY WILSON, DA ALGHNY and ATTY GEN PA
Innis v. Wilson, et al
as 08-4909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT INNIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY WILSON, Superintendent, MICHAEL J. HERBIK, SHARON BURKS, Chief Grievance Officer, D.O.C. and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
MARY ANN KUSHNER, Grievance Coordinator
Alonzo Hodges v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 08-4868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO HODGES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY WILSON, Superintendent, SHELLY MANKEY, CHARLES POWLEY, Unit Manager and others
Tracy Watts v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 08-4886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY WATTS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY WILSON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
KENNY v. NEWHOUSE et al
as 2:2008cv01493
Plaintiff:
RICARDO KENNY
Defendant:
NEWHOUSE, GUTY, MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCGOLDRICK v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01165
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGOLDRICK
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and HARRY WILSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
