Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00895
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Assistant Attorney General Del, et al
as 16-3324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
James Biggins v. Maryland District Court #2-3 D
as 16-6875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT #2-3 D.C. and WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
James Biggins v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 16-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
James Biggins v. Delaware Department of Correct, et al
as 16-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS
James Biggins v. State of Delaware, et al
as 16-1467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Biggins v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00552
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
David Pierce and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
James Biggins v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 15-1099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
James Biggins v. Robert Burns, et al
as 14-4582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
ROBERT M. BURNS, BERRY BURNMAN, JOHN BURTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA, RONALD L. WILEY, JAMES SCARBOROUGH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
