Cases 11 - 20 of 2,052
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
John F. Curran
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michelle Shoemaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips, Tennessee Department of Correction and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Defendant:
TDOC, Jerrie Avery, Anna Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Ramsey William Harris
Defendant:
Vincent Vantell and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
John Eric Wells
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Jon Walton, Bargery Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
