Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Shack v. Mason et al
as 4:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Shack
Defendant:
John Mason, Carter Davenport and Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Carson et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Daundera Dwight Pierce
Defendant:
Arethia Carson, Willie Myles, John Mason and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason et al v. Hale et al
as 7:2011cv03155
Plaintiff:
John Mason, IV and Ishmael Gregory
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Jefferson County Alabama , Jefferson County Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Harper v. Oldham County Jail, et al
as 11-5747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JOSEPH HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL, JOHN MASON, JEFF MCGOHON and others
Harper v. Oldham County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Harper
Defendant:
Oldham County Jail, John Mason, Jeff McGohon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Harper v. Oldham County Jail, et al
as 11-5007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JOSEPH HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL, JOHN MASON, JEFF MCGOHON and others
Fuller v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv03633
Plaintiff:
David B Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas, Laura Isbell, Carl Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Kirrire et al
as 4:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Wade Kirrire, David Wise, Russell A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Oldham County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00993
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Harper
Defendant:
Oldham County Jail, John Mason, Jeff McGohon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00609
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Plaintiff:
John Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
