Cases 11 - 20 of 70
MEDINA v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARIO MEDINA
Defendant:
OFFICER JONES, SERGEANT WINGER, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
OWENS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
STEPHEN OWENS
Respondent:
BLANCHE CARNEY, JOHN/JANE DOE #1, JOHN/JANE DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS COMMISSIONER, JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Hauser et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
Christina Hauser, Jane Doe #1, Capt. Dreher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2021cv05282
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISTER v. MEYER et al
as 2:2021cv05058
Plaintiff:
TARRELL R. RISTER
Defendant:
GREGORY MEYER, MICHAEL T. LAVERGHETTA, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent Jamey P. Luther, Officer Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
