Cases 11 - 20 of 209
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornett v. Asheville Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Cornett, Sr.
Defendant:
Asheville Police Department, City of Asheville and Buncombe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Divine v. Buchholtz et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Versa Divine and Marcus Devan Hunter
Defendant:
Peter R. Buchholtz, Kimberly D. Grande, Harold Reep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Foster
as 5:2023ct03220
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Wendell Ward
Defendant:
Jeffrey B. Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. North Carolina St. DPS
as 5:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Jeffrey D. Tucker
Respondent:
North Carolina St. DPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYNES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
JEFFREY DEMETRIUS HAYNES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas-Aleman v. Warden FCI Butner Low
as 5:2023hc02120
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Eduardo Salinas-Aleman
Respondent:
Warden FCI Butner Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gaillard v. Odham et al
as 5:2023ct03154
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gaillard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Odham, Lewis B. Leonard, P. Robinett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. OXENDINE et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
JUSTIN OXENDINE, WILBERT WALKER, STEVEN GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
