Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Gonzalez v. Holland et al
as 3:2014cv01629
Petitioner:
Victorino Gonzalez
Respondent:
Kim Holland and Kama D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodward v. Tillinghast et al
as 1:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Tillinghast, Dalia, Furney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy v. Kamas et al
as 6:2012cv06201
Plaintiff:
William Nealy
Defendant:
P. Kamas, P. Mastrantonio and James Escfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl G Blossomgame v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 2:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Carl G Blossomgame
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Matthew Cate, Secretary of Correct Matthew Cate and others
Richardson v. Napoli et al
as 9:2009cv01440
Plaintiff:
George Richardson
Defendant:
Napoli, Chappins, Kamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Lomako v. A. Kane
as 09-56429
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUSTIN LOMAKO, AKA Justin Kama Lomako
Respondent - Appellee:
A. P. KANE, Warden
KAMA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00689
Petitioner:
KOURTNEY DWAYNE KAMA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Omar Ammouri v. Adappt House, Inc., et al
as 08-3481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR AMMOURI
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAPPT HOUSE INC, DONNA CONELY, BENJAMIN KAMA and others
Defendant:
DESMOND HAMMON
Lomako v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for the State of California
as 3:2007cv05087
Petitioner:
Justin Kama Lomako
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. State of New York et al
as 9:2007cv00544
Plaintiff:
George M. Richardson
Defendant:
State of New York, Annetts, Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
