Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Nagl v. Garvey et al
as 1:2016cv00269
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Nagl, Jr.
Defendant:
Garvey , Amy and Ashley
Interested_party:
Case Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonnell v. Mapes
as 4:2015cv00412
Petitioner:
Kevin John McDonnell
Respondent:
Terry Mapes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 15-3485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Lucinda Jesson, Kevin Moser, Peter Puffer and others
Foster v. Grady et al
as 1:2015cv08442
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Foster
Defendant:
William Grady, Tom Angell, "John" Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Grady et al
as 6:2015cv06586
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Foster
Defendant:
William Grady, Tom Angell, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 15-1500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Ehrich v. USA
as 0:2013cv03031
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin John Ehrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeVillion v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02134
Plaintiff:
Kevin John DeVillion
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Karsjens et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2011cv03659
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Karsjens , David LeRoy Gamble , Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braget v. United States Bureau of Perison Allenwood et al
as 1:2011cv02123
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Braget
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Perison Allenwood, Cims and Seperation S.I.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
