Cases 11 - 20 of 24
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03375
Petitioner:
KEENAN MCINTOSH
Respondent:
JOHN E WETZEL, ERIC TICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00110
Respondent:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOHN E. WETZEL, ERIC TICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNAN MCINTOSH and KEENAN MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dupree v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2021cv01944
Respondent:
JOSH SHAPIRO, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOHN E WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS DUPREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS v. STOKES et al
as 2:2021cv01222
Defendant:
JENNIFER O. ANDRESS, JOHN WETZEL, DANIEL P. ALVA and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv00878
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Lawrence S. Krasner and Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dupree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENNETT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
TERRELL BENNETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and SCI-CHESTER SUPT. MARRISA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUSH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv05816
Petitioner:
LARRY RUSH and LEROY THOMAS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOPER v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2019cv05604
Petitioner:
HOWARD COOPER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE S. KRASNER PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GAGO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv03064
Petitioner:
EDWIN GAGO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, TERESA DELBALSO, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOKES v. MARSH et al
as 2:2019cv03019
Petitioner:
JOSHUA STOKES
Respondent:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOSH SHAPIRO and ROBERT MARSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
