Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Chrisco v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
Richard F. Raemisch, Gallardo, Krakow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2014cv01615
Defendant:
Mrs. Kimberlee Ackeemoto, Mr. Drake Durham, Mrs. Julie E. Frantz and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Edwards, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01613
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards Junior v. Frantz et al
as 3:2014cv01378
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Edwards Junior
Defendant:
Honorable Ms. Julie E. Frantz, Honorable Ms. Skye Kelly and Ms. Annamarie Shoen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford Edwards v. Florida Parole Commission
as 13-13627
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRADFORD LYNN EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Edwards v. Florida Parole Commission
as 0:2013cv61515
Plaintiff:
Bradford Lynn Edwards
Defendant:
Florida Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Enid Police Dept. et al
as 5:2012cv00500
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Lynn Edwards
Defendant:
Enid Police Department, Officer Bush, Officer Fuska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamlet v. Moss et al
as 0:2012cv60819
Plaintiff:
Lynn Edward Hamlet
Defendant:
Thomas P Moss, David Krathen and Clerk of Court, Broward County Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Enid Police Dept. et al
as 4:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Lynn Edwards
Defendant:
Enid Police Dept., Officer Bush, Officer Fuska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Edwards v. Edward Coble, et al
as 10-41351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY LYNN EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD COBLE and HOLLIS DRISCOLL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
