Cases 11 - 20 of 26
BARRY v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
as 3:2020cv00051
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE and CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Petitioner:
ABDOULAYE BARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADIGUN v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
as 3:2020cv00012
Petitioner:
ADEBISI ADIGUN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE, CHRISTIAN M. SMITH and WARDEN OF CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HECTOR v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
as 3:2019cv00192
Petitioner:
MEDERA HECTOR
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE and CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AFRIYIE v. SMITH
as 3:2019cv00102
Petitioner:
AKWASI AFRIYIE
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. ERIE STATE PAROLE et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
JARED M. SMITH
Defendant:
ERIE STATE PAROLE and MICHAEL D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2017cv03852
Petitioner:
RICHARD M. SMITH
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOOZER v. RIGGENBACH et al
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Defendant:
ANGELA RIGGENBACH, L.S. KERNS-BARR, MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Bey v. Altmanshofer
as 3:2014cv02029
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Smith-Bey
Defendant:
William Altmanshofer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARSELLI v. HARKLAND et al
as 2:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
TODD (HYUNG-RAE) TARSELLI
Defendant:
HARKLAND , J. M. SMITH , HAYWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
