Cases 11 - 20 of 185
RASHEED v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv01513
Petitioner:
ABDUL RASHEED
Respondent:
WARDEN MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pagan v. Capozza et al
as 1:2021cv01804
Petitioner:
Xavier Jason Pagan
Respondent:
Mark Capozza, District Attorney of Berks County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALEXANDER v. CAPOZZA
as 2:2021cv04668
Petitioner:
LOUIS ALEXANDER
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILEY v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv02798
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARK CAPOZZA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ERROL T. WILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
IRBY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00741
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JEROME IRBY, JR.
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, MARK CAPOZZA and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dominick v. Capozza et al
as 1:2021cv00555
Respondent:
Mark Capozza, PA Attorney General and District Attorney Of Lackawanna County
Petitioner:
Jason J. Dominick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALSTON v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2021cv00354
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, SCOTT MICKELSON, AURANDT and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ALSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DelValles-Vincente v. Capozza et al
as 3:2021cv00335
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Mark Capozza
Petitioner:
Ruben DelValles-Vincente
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN V. CAPOZZA, ETAL
as 2:2021cv00608
Petitioner:
JOHN IN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF :, MARK CAPOZZA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF:
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
