Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,579
LYNVAL v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv04264
Petitioner: LYNVAL GEORGE REECE
Respondent: ROY HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRYCE V.CHERTOFF
as 2:2012cv04052
Petitioner: ADDISABETH PRYCE
Respondent: MICHAEL CHERTOFF and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRISON v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv02694
Petitioner: RICARDO P. MORRISON
Respondent: ROY HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARTLEY v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv02574
Petitioner: JULIAN A. BARTLEY
Respondent: ROY HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAVIN v. FRANCIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00096
Petitioner: MIKHAIL SAVIN
Respondent: L. FRANCIS, JOHN TSOUKARIS and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02984
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02983
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02821
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02673
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SINGH v. Clark et al
as 3:2011cv00319
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Neil Clark and Eric Holder, Jr.
Notice Only Party: Magdalena Jara
Petitioner: SARVJIT SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?