Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hunter v. Parnell et al
as 5:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell and Daniel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Chrysalis Health et al
as 1:2017cv20621
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Chrysalis Health, Harbor House Supportive Housing and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Lovett et al
as 2:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
FNU Lovett, FNU Anderson, FNU Stahling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. LOVETT et al
as 4:2016cv00786
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL HUNTER
Defendant:
LOVETT, ANDERSON, STAHLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Wackenhut Security Company et al
as 0:2016cv62926
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Wackenhut Security Company, City of Miami Police Department, City of Miami Mass Transit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Wackenhut Security Company et al
as 1:2016cv25160
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Wackenhut Security Company, City of Miami Police Department, City of Miami Mass Transit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. North Bay Village Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv24306
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
North Bay Village Police Department, Captain of North Bay Village Police Department and John Doe Arresting Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Risperdal Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv24309
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Risperdal Corporation, Florida State Prisons, Tallahassee Mental Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Medical Staff et al
as 1:2016cv21556
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Nurses, Matan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. US Probation Officer et al
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
US Probation Officer, Daniel Hovland and U S Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
