Cases 11 - 20 of 294
Adams v. Monti
as 3:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Jerome Adams
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrera et al v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr., Tyron Dyeralle Davis, Cesar Rueda and others
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Monti
as 3:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Edward Williams
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Monti
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Edward Williams
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al Momani v. Monti et al
as 2:2024cv02017
Petitioner:
Baha'Eddin Al Momani
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Defendant:
Service List
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al Momani v. Monti et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Baha'Eddin Al Momani
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dzbik v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Dzbik
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Percy Meyers and Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Dana Brown
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Daniel Monti, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Monti et al
as 1:2023cv16541
Petitioner:
Michael Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Adult & Teen Challenge et al.
as 4:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
Monty Robinson
Defendant:
Adult & Teen Challenge, Joey Vorheez, Bob Pavlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
