Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Harold Hobbs
Defendant:
Dexer Payne, Seamster, Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, B Carroll, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Freeman et al
as 4:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Caelin S Duke
Defendant:
William Freeman, Benjamin Caple, Joseph P Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Nathan H Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Joseph Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahman X v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Rahman X
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshal Dale Reed, Jennifer Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, James Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilliam v. Mahoney et al
as 4:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Onald Gilliam
Defendant:
Joseph Mahoney, Barbara Smallwood, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Arkansas General Assembly et al
as 4:2021cv00495
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Mahoney, Lindsy and others
Plaintiff:
Winston Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
