Cases 11 - 20 of 23
ARNOLD v. G.E.O. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv05407
Defendant:
TAMMY S. FERGUSON, G.E.O. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONS, CHIEF JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE A. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. GEORGE W. HILL (CERT TEAM) CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv04671
Plaintiff:
LAMAR A. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LT. MOODY, GEORGE W. HILL (CERT TEAM) CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, OFFICER SIRODEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEH v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv05417
Defendant:
SGT ROYALS, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LT MOODY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMPSON BLEH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. PAUP et al
as 2:2019cv00280
Defendant:
RACQUEL, KATAYOUN COPELAND, JOHN HOSIER and others
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brandon Moody
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017cv01019
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLMES
Respondent:
CARTER, MOODY, BALDWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRNES v. MOODY et al
as 2:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. BYRNES
Defendant:
ALLAN K. MOODY, TIMOTHY A. LEWIS, BRET JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02117
Petitioner:
ALEX MOODY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moody v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Keith Moody
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Nancy D. Hogan, Bureau of Labor Statistics and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
