Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Olivier v. Kernan
as 1:2017cv01367
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Olivier
Defendant:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivier v. Kernan
as 4:2017cv04953
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Olivier
Defendant:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mardoche Olivier v. Montgomery County Courts, et al
as 17-5797
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL- BONDING COMPANY and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Mardoche Olivier v. TN, et al
as 17-5738
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL and others
Mardoche Olivier v. TN, et al
as 17-5739
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL and others
Mardoche Olivier v. TN, et al
as 17-5735
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL and others
Olivier v. Correctional Healthcare Companies Incorporated et al
as 3:2017cv08120
Plaintiff:
Rodney D Olivier
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies Incorporated, Management and Training Corporation , Hammad Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mardoche Olivier v. TN, et al
as 17-5663
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS and MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL- BONDING COMPANY
Mardoche Olivier v. TN, et al
as 17-5666
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL and others
Mardoche Olivier v. TN, et al
as 17-5664
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS and MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL- BONDING COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
