Cases 11 - 20 of 21
David Kissi v. Paul Clement
as 08-4028
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL CLEMENT, et al.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRENTICE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN et al
as 1:2008cv00804
Petitioner:
GLENN PRENTICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NA., GEORGE BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POWELL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv00379
Petitioner:
LARRY POWELL
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, R. E. HOLT, DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zaidi v. Clement et al
as 5:2007cv01119
Petitioner:
Adnan H Zaidi
Respondent:
Paul Clement, Michael Chertoff, Nuria Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LEHDER RIVAS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv01733
Petitioner:
CARLOS ENRIQUE LEHDER RIVAS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, PAUL CLEMENT, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv04371
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
