Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Missouri v. Spivey et al
as 5:2013cv01326
Plaintiff:
Elijah Missouri
Defendant:
Peggy Spivey , Kershaw County , Crystal Rufus-Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Martin v. Rush et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Norris Allen Martin
Defendant:
F Emory Rush, Michael R Culler, Jr, Jack Colman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singleton v. Spivey et al
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Frank T Singleton, III
Defendant:
Peggy Spivey, Justin Dill and Chris Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Valbert v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2012cv01973
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellis Valbert
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, Gaylan Sanders, Harold Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Spivey et al
as 0:2012cv00739
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Peggy E Spivey and C Rufus Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branham v. Spivey et al
as 5:2011cv01216
Plaintiff:
George Stanley Branham, II
Defendant:
Peggy Spivey , Murry Hudson , Crystal Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branham v. Spivey et al
as 8:2011cv01216
Plaintiff:
George Stanley Branham, II
Defendant:
Peggy Spivey, Murry Hudson, Crystal Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles et al v. Alvin S Glenn Detention Center et al
as 8:2008cv03097
Plaintiff:
Michael L Voyles and Peggy Voyles
Defendant:
Alvin S Glenn Detention Center and Richland County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. El et al
as 6:2008cv01232
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Peggy Franklin El and Johnnie Franklin El
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , SC Dept Probation Parole and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
