Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Mallory v. Mims et al
as 4:2018cv00831
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gene Mallory
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Mims and Paris Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Moss et al
as 6:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gene Mallory
Defendant:
FNU Moss and Paris Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hardy v. Ernest Gonzalez, et al
as 13-40385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MARK HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNEST GONZALEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, ROBERT GERARD ARAMBIDE, Public Defender, TOMMY MOORE, Paris Police Department and others
Gore v. Superville, et al
as 09-40035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD MARK GORE
Defendant - Appellee:
M C SUPERVILLE, Judge, Lamar County, TX, EARNEST SPARKS, Justice of the Peace, Princinct 5, Lamar County, TX, DANNY HUFF, Officer, Paris Police Department and others
Hearn v. Paris Police Dept, et al
as 08-41295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIX L HEARN
Defendant - Appellee:
PARIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, KARL LEWIS, Chief, Paris Police Department, STEPHEN HOLMES, Sergeant Badge 155 Paris Police Department and others
Dale v. Paris Police Department et al
as 5:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
Philip Lee Dale, Sr.
Defendant:
Paris Police Department, Chris Livingood, Brett Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hearn v. Paris Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv00184
Plaintiff:
Felix L Hearn
Defendant:
Paris Police Department, Karl Lewis, Stephen Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Remsburg v. Wilson et al
as 4:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Daniel Remsburg
Defendant:
Jimmy Greg Wilson, Texas Department of Public Safety, Shane Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearn v. Paris Police Department
as 4:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
Felix L Hearn
Defendant:
Paris Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
