Cases 11 - 20 of 164
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. BROWN
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and VANDERBURGH COUNTY GRIEVANCE CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01054
Petitioner:
Michael T Robinson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KELLER v. ALLISON et al
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. KELLER
Defendant:
GARY ALLISON, TOMMI HAMILTON, RUSSELL CONRAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Pena, Jr
Defendant:
Bridegroom, Robinson, Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. REGALE et al
as 1:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
REGALE, HOWARD, GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SLOWN et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant:
L. SLOWN, K. LEEK, NOAH ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RAY ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
