Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Schmidt v. Norman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00601
Petitioner: Randolph Schmidt
Respondent: Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. USA
as 4:2018cv00234
Respondent: USA
Movant: Terry W Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randolph v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 4:2017cv02838
Plaintiff: Ronnie Randolph
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. USA
as 4:2016cv01046
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Randolph E. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hicklin v. Lombardi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01357
Plaintiff: Jessica Hicklin
Defendant: George Lombardi , Dwayne Kempker , Ian Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Hill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00046
Plaintiff: Robert Lee
Defendant: Nina Hill, Linda Aufield, Kimberly Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabelman v. Randolph County Justice Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00077
Plaintiff: Cory Gregory Gabelman
Defendant: Randolph County Justice Center, Randy Smith, Nancy Courtny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2014cv03084
Plaintiff: Ronnie Randolph
Defendant: Michael Bowersox and L. Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creighton v. Hakala et al
as 1:2014cv00010
Plaintiff: Rodney Creighton
Defendant: Michael Hakala, Kimberly S. Randolph and Judy Wonderly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Denney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv01098
Petitioner: Matthew Bradley Randolph
Respondent: Larry Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?