Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Ronald Jones v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 16-3555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ronald Jones v. State of Delaware
as 16-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE
Jones et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv10045
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones , Elijah Lynah and Adam Kinley
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Jones v. Warden Northern State Prison, et al
as 15-3185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN NORTHERN STATE PRISON and COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ronald Jones v. Warden Northern State Prison, et al
as 15-3186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN NORTHERN STATE PRISON and COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
BOLICK v. FAGAN et al
as 5:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J BOLICK
Defendant:
JOHN FAGAN, BERRY, ARBRA CHILDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Delaware
as 1:2014cv01396
Petitioner:
Ronald Jones
Respondent:
State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. MCKOY et al
as 2:2013cv07832
Plaintiff:
RONALD JONES
Defendant:
B. MCKOY, JOHN DOE, COUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LAGANA et al
as 1:2013cv05185
Petitioner:
RONALD JONES
Respondent:
PAUL K. LAGANA and GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. LAGANA et al
as 1:2012cv05823
Petitioner:
RONALD JONES
Respondent:
PAUL K. LAGANA and GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
