Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Thomas Beale v. Paul Little, et al
as 23-1656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BEALE
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PAUL G. LITTLE, D.O. Resident Physician, SCI Chester by Way of Wellpath and ALICIA ROSS, RN, Correctional Health Care Administrator, SCI Chester
GARZA
as 2:2021cv01179
In Re:
EDWARD GARZA
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER PA, PENNSYLVANIA D.O.C., ET AL, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. GARZA, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARIS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2020cv03700
Defendant:
MARIROSA LAMAS, SARGENT (JOHN DOE), C O. ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. PARIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
TERRELL BENNETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and SCI-CHESTER SUPT. MARRISA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MACK-TANSMORE v. MR. JONES et al
as 2:2020cv00689
Defendant:
S.P. GREEN, MR. JONES, MS. QUINN and others
Plaintiff:
HASHEAM MACK-TANSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI CHESTER et al
as 2:2019cv01244
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI CHESTER
Petitioner:
TERRELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARTER v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CHESTER et al
as 2:2019cv00449
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _______________
Petitioner:
ARNETT CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PONZO v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI-CHESTER et al
as 2:2018cv05154
Petitioner:
LEROY PONZO
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and SUPERINTENDENT SCI-CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REYES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01186
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. REYES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI-CHESTER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARIOLA v. SCI CHESTER et al
as 2:2017cv03851
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CARIOLA
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, LAMAS, EASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
