Cases 11 - 20 of 344
Andres v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Bismar Francisco Andres
Defendant:
Pierce County, Severson, C/O Desmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neil Rudolph
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Roberts, Jr and Joe JW Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Crystal Gutierrez, James Kent, Mark McClanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
Matt Wright
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Christine Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Estes v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Jacy Joe Estes
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeAir v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05738
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Grey LeAir
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
Jess Richard Smith
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Combs v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05727
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Combs
Defendant:
Eric B Smith, Corey D Evans and Carter H Whipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05720
Plaintiff:
Zakery Michael Bonds
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
