Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Elvis Soto-Muniz v. Allan Martin, et al
as 15-1874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVIS SOTO-MUNIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLAN MARTIN, CORIZON INC, FKA Correctional Medical Services Inc, DAVID MEEKER and others
MASSARO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2013cv06958
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MASSARO
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI, SOLIMAN, ALLEN MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02794
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv06087
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., ART BREWER, Y. SOLIMAN, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saavedra v. Kernan et al
as 2:2013cv01499
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Saavedra
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Anthony Chaus, Douglas McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saavedra v. Kernan et al
as 1:2014cv00870
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Saavedra
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Anthony Chaus, Douglas McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., UNIVERSITY MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, UCHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARROYO v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07889
Petitioner:
PAULINO SOLIMAN ARROYO
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re Terrorist Attacks on Sep
as 11-3556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hector Flamenco
Defendant - Appellee:
Yeslam Binladin, Abdulrahman Bin Mahfouz, African Muslim Agency and others
In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
as 1:2011cv02281
Plaintiff:
Hector Flamenco
Defendant:
Yeslam Binladin, Abdulrahman Bin Mahfouz, African Muslim Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
