Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Broadhead v. Olds et al
as 2:2014cv01198
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Centovriad Olds, Brian Robinson, Sterling Steed and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Olds et al
as 2:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Centauriad Olds, Sterling Steed, T Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lynn Sterling
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Tim Russell, Henry Mabry and others
Cause Of Action: O
McCrary v. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00725
Plaintiff:
Sterling Ray McCrary
Defendant:
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and Supreme Court of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrary v. Myles et al
as 5:2007cv00500
Petitioner:
Sterling Ray McCrary
Respondent:
Walter Myles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCrary v. Dunmore et al
as 2:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
Sterling Ray McCrary
Defendant:
Jay Dunmore, Jason C Corts, Scottsboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrary v. Grider et al
as 2:2007cv00341
Plaintiff:
Sterling Ray McCrary
Defendant:
Ralph Grider, Chris Kirby, Jenifer C Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrary v. Curts et al
as 2:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Sterling Ray McCrary
Defendant:
Jason L Curts, Scott Whited, Scottsboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Everett et al
as 2:2007cv00244
Plaintiff:
Gary Keith White
Defendant:
Everett, Dover and Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCrary v. Holt et al
as 5:2007cv00217
Plaintiff:
Sterling Ray McCrary
Defendant:
Jenifer C Holt, Rechel Morgan, Charles R Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
