Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Al-Haqq v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
Bilal A Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Joette D Scarborough and AW Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. McCall et al
as 8:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
Brian Franklin Evans
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Donika Gray, Joette D Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asbury v. Tartarsky et al
as 8:2013cv03364
Plaintiff:
Willie James Asbury
Defendant:
David Tartarsky, Don Driskell, Joette Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spears v. South Carolina Dept of Corr et al
as 6:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Corr, Ernest Mims, Edward Lucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Spears v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv03175
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacchus v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2010cv02857
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Defendant:
Lt Scarborough, Lt Richardson, Lt Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
James v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2010cv02794
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Wonda Scarborough, Anthony J Padula and Warden of Lee Correctional Inst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinnedy III v. Kee-Lippe et al
as 6:2010cv02298
Plaintiff:
William C McKinnedy III
Defendant:
Brenda Kee-Lippe, Sgt Clark, G Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00201
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv03921
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Counsels of Record and Riley and Scarborough
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
