Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Newby v. WellPath et al
as 4:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Joshua Deshun Newby
Defendant:
WellPath and Does ACC Security Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogburn v. WellPath et al
as 4:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Cogburn
Defendant:
WellPath, Does ACC Security Staff and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Langley et al
as 4:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Allen Polk
Defendant:
Langley, Moore, Does Sgt or Security Staff, PCDF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
Allen Polk
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2021cv01225
Plaintiff:
Ricky D London
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, WellPath, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaquez v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Lyndon Allen, Christopher Budnick and others
Plaintiff:
John J Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmoth v. Jackson et al
as 2:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilmoth
Defendant:
Randell, Emsweather, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Arnette Walters
Defendant:
Does Armark Kitchen Staff; Turn Key Employees; PCRDC Security/Deputies and Pulaski County Regional Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKee v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv01406
Plaintiff:
Jerry McKee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Scott et al
as 4:2020cv00058
Defendant:
D Haynes, Paul Scott, R Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
