Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Obannon v. Pichon et al
as 5:2017cv01700
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Obannon
Defendant:
Rise Jones Pichon, Jane Doe Pichon, Jeff Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2016cv01736
Plaintiff:
Shawn P. Powell
Defendant:
Debrah Shaffer, Joan Risely and Clinton County Corrections Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Jenkins v. MDOC, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAROLE BOARD, ABSCONDER RECOVERY UNIT and others
Wade Robertson v. Rise Pichon, et al
as 15-16463
Petitioner - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RISE JONES PICHON, Administrative Law Judge, Judge of Santa Clara Superior Court and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ross v. Krueger, et al
as 2:2015cv01251
Plaintiff:
Jesse Aron Ross
Defendant:
Amy Krueger, Nye County, Anthony Demeo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McAllister et al v. Stancil et al
as 1:2015cv00984
Petitioner:
Robert McAllister, Gerald Rising, Jr., Arun Sharma and others
Respondent:
Stancil, R. Derr and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Rising et al
as 2:2015cv00984
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
Rising, Reiner, Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Helfrich v. Marshall et al
as 2:2015cv00393
Defendant:
Greg Arms, FNU Balding, Beverly Bayne and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Jason Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Rising
as 14-1518
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD R. RISING, JR., AKA Gerry Rising
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
