Cases 11 - 20 of 93
WEAVER v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv03872
Petitioner:
LOVELLE WEAVER
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARROLL, JR. v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DELAWARE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Clark
Defendant:
J. Weaver, Sgt. John Doe Smouse, Lt. John Doe Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Weaver
as 5:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
GERALD P. WEAVER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Weaver v. Doll et al
as 3:2021cv02078
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Weaver
Defendant:
Clair Doll, Adam Ogle, Lawrence Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01994
Plaintiff:
Tarahjay M Ross
Defendant:
Captain Steve Smith, Lt. Greg Mendenhall, Lt. Richard Armermann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00688
Defendant:
C/O 2 LARRY LEWIS, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, DR. STANLEY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00343
Defendant:
C/O 2 HARAUSE, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
