Cases 11 - 20 of 26
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. PARSEK et al
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOHN PARSEK, MARION WILSON, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE N.C. ZONING DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinnon v. Wayne County Municipality et al
as 5:2016ct03089
Plaintiff:
Dequonta McKinnon
Defendant:
Wayne County Municipality, Wayne County Sheriff's Department, Michael Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of NC et al
as 5:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
State of NC, NC Attorney General's Office, Iredell County and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015ct03247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Sykes et al
as 5:2015ct03202
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Eric Sykes, Steve Lenaier, Chris Sasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORE II v. CRADDOCK et al
as 1:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
H.L. CRADDOCK, ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and L. BOARDMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haze v. Harrison et al
as 5:2015ct03109
Plaintiff:
Grant Ruffin Haze, III
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Ms. Scott, Ms. Fredrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Britt et al
as 5:2015ct03023
Plaintiff:
John Edward Butler
Defendant:
Luther Johnson Britt, Henry Ward Oxendine, Robeson County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
