Cases 11 - 20 of 148
Young v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Matthew Young
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, Multnomah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Young et al
as 6:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Daryl Borello, Chaplain Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. State of Oregon
as 3:2022cv00990
Petitioner:
Matthew Robert Young
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moyle Stiles v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00981
Plaintiff:
Cameron Alexander Moyle Stiles
Defendant:
Andrew K. Young, Mina M. Cavalli-Singer, Vanna K. Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dale Eaton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Ms. Colette Peters, Ms. Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Young et al
as 3:2021cv01896
Plaintiff:
George Lee Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Roger Haefer, S. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01323
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Hendrix
as 3:2021cv00915
Petitioner:
Darryl William Young
Respondent:
DeWayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hollinquest v. Young et al
as 6:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Defendant:
Daryle Borello, Stuart Young and Nathaline Frener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
