Cases 11 - 20 of 22,895
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Drake et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Drake, Brian Coleman, Mr. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Washington
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
D. Washinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Keith et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Keith and Julian A. Savannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. United State of America
as 2:2024cv08015
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Defendant:
John Hamm, Wendy Williams, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grice v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Robert Grice
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional Facility, Joseph Headley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Marshall
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Edward Ray Dillard
Defendant:
Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hines v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Mark Hines
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Alabama Department of Corrections and Central Record
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
