Cases 241 - 250 of 344
ALI v. RUSS et al
as 1:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SHAKUR ALI
Defendant:
D. R. RUSS and T. H. BRANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
TODD SNYDER, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and WANDA H. SHOCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03179
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Kathleen Sibileus, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Florez v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03162
Plaintiff:
Raymond Florez
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Craig Apker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Department of Corrections
as 5:2013hc02134
Petitioner:
James H. Murray
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ v. FORSYTH COUNTY COURT, NC et al
as 1:2013cv00379
Petitioner:
CECIO H. HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
FORSYTH COUNTY COURT, NC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMMONS v. SHOCKLEY
as 1:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
WONDA H. SHOCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shackley v. Elks
as 5:2013hc02066
Petitioner:
Norman H Shackley
Respondent:
Neil Elks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez-Valdez v. O'Malley et al
as 3:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Mendez-Valdez
Defendant:
Thomas O'Malley, Kimberly Y. Best, Denzil H. Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Curran et al
as 5:2013ct03037
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Martha H. Curran, Andrew Murray, Christian Hoel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
