Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 13-6636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
James Losey v. Raju Paturi, et al
as 13-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LOSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAJU PATURI, Psychiatrist - Private and Employed by McLean County Jail, MIKE EMERY, Sheriff, GREG ALLEN, Superintendent and others
Teddy Allman v. Patrick Kessinger, et al
as 12-5891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEDDY ALBERT ALLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK H. KESSINGER and COOKIE CREWS, Warden
In re: Aundra Beckem
as 12-1966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEDDY ALBERT ALLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK H. KESSINGER and COOKIE CREWS, Warden
Allman v. Kessinger et al
as 3:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
Teddy Albert Allman
Defendant:
Patrick H. Kessinger and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Losey v. Paturi et al
as 1:2011cv01328
Plaintiff:
James Losey
Defendant:
Raju Paturi, Mike Emery, Greg Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Strong
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Mary Fallin, C. Steven Kessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Strong
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Mary Fallin, C. Steven Kessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte v. Templeton et al
as 1:2011cv02458
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Merritte
Defendant:
Thomas Templeton, Art Preci, Jason Edgcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. Crews et al
as 3:2011cv00085
Petitioner:
James Carl Higgs
Respondent:
Cookie Crews, Patrick H. Kessinger, Jeanette M. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
