Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Robertson v. Allen
as 2:2010cv00375
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Robertson
Respondent:
Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Core v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2010cv00045
Defendant:
Dr. McFarland, Major Torbert, Margaret Mayfield and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leon Core
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipsey v. Langford et al
as 2:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Lipsey
Defendant:
Larry Langford, Birmingham City Council, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Underwood v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Stanley Underwood
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Chris Robertson, Officer Chasen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2008cv01923
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dixon
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama, Pelham PD, Bessemer PD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Borowski et al v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2008cv01862
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Borowski, Darryl Dixon and Irby Cain
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama, Richard H Strickland, K Box and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robertson v. Correctional Medical Services et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00491
Plaintiff:
George Dean Robertson
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, John Peasant, Mrs. Burks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hendrix v. Edward et al
as 2:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hendrix
Defendant:
Edward, R Robertson, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanford v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2008cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jeffery B. Sanford
Defendant:
Jay Jones, C. Tolbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Todd v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2007cv01021
Plaintiff:
Ira C. Todd
Defendant:
J. Jones, C. Tolbert, C. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
