Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Joseph Green v. E. Boakye
as 15-7885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BOAKYE, Medical Director Riverside Regional Jail and JEFFERY NEWTON
Defendant:
JEFFERY NEWCOME, RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, et al., VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Victor Etterson v. E. Boakye
as 15-1723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR M. ETTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BOAKYE, Dr., Director of Medical Dept., Riverside Regional Jail, JEFFERY NEWCOME, Superintendent, Riverside Regional Jail, WOODS, Jailer, Riverside Regional Jail and others
Baker v. Daniels et al
as 2:2014cv00621
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Baker
Defendant:
Mrs. Daniels, McCormic and Jeffery Newcome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Boakye et al
as 1:2014cv01644
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Green
Defendant:
E. Boakye, Jeffery Newcome and Keys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sourdiff v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Russell M. Sourdiff, II
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Dr. Boakye, Nurse Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00501
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Rice
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome, Captain Mack #8 and Cpl. Jail. Jones #231
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aquino v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Andrew P. Aquino
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome and Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etterson v. Newcome et al
as 3:2014cv00650
Plaintiff:
Victor Etterson
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome, Moore and McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etterson v. Boakye et al
as 3:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Etterson
Defendant:
E. Boakye, Jeffery Newcome, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Anson Taylor
Defendant:
Mr. Jeffrey Newcome, Dr. E. Boakye and Mrs. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
