Cases 21 - 30 of 307
Young v. USA
as 4:2022cv00719
Petitioner:
Paris B Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Blitz et al
as 4:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Robert D. Blitz and Kelly Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Precythe, et al.
as 6:2022cv03220
Plaintiff:
Wesley Everette Marks
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, LaDonna M Buckner, Billy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Mikela Jackson and Jean Kelly
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Chief James B. McMillan, Josh S. Golightly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Mikela Jackson and Jean Kelly
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Chief James B. McMillan, Josh S. Golightly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 5:2022cv06088
Plaintiff:
Rodney B Holmes
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Phyllis Phelps, Emily Nixdorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00500
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. USA
as 4:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Anthony B Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Howard et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Troy Williams
Defendant:
Woody Howard, Robert Mays, Jimmy Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rey v. Reed et al
as 6:2021cv03316
Plaintiff:
Colby C Rey
Defendant:
Darren Reed, Glenn B. Adler, Pablo Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
