Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Anderson et al v. Grande et al
as 5:2022ct03405
Plaintiff:
Lamate Sherron Anderson and Every Inmate of State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Grande, D. Clark, Officer Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 1:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv00835
Petitioner:
DAVID FRANCIS CLARK and PREZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MEBANE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ROGERS, CPT JOHNSON, LIEUTENANT BURLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ROGERS, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, LIEUTENANT BURLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dasha Clark Norman
Defendant:
Wayn Brown and Wayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Simpson et al
as 5:2022ct03252
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Simpson, Dr. Straiger, Dr. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT, TONY BETHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv00394
Petitioner:
KELSE DEANN CLARK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
