Cases 21 - 30 of 132
Miller v. Sims et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Isaac Miller
Defendant:
Sims and Ron Neal
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. MARION CO. SHERIFF ADULT DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TERREALL SIMS
Respondent:
MARION CO. SHERIFF ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
ZATECKY, JACK HENDRIX, PAULA DICKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINGERS v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
DEREK D. FINGERS
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., ERIC HOLCOMB, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. WEXFORD MEDICAL PROVIDERS
as 1:2022cv02000
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SIMS
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL PROVIDERS, CHILDERS, WANANU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Defendant:
VANIHEL, ANDREA MASON, A. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. CUPP et al
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CUPP, SIMS, KERIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. BREWER et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
BREWER, WONDER, SCALON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
WARDEN, POPE, BENIFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Lionel A Sims
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
