Cases 21 - 30 of 55
VILLEGAS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, et al
as 2:2014cv07337
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO VILLEGAS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., RALPH WOODWARD, M.D., ABU AHSAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KADONSKY v. AHSAN, ET AL.
as 3:2014cv07248
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN , DONIQUE IVERY , NURSE LANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Dykeman v. Abu Ahsan, et al
as 14-4464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DYKEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ABU AHSAN, UMDNJ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Robert Small v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 14-4256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. SMALL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY M. LANIGAN, RALPH WOODWARD, GREG BARTKOWSKI and others
LITTLE v. IVERY et al
as 3:2014cv04493
Plaintiff:
AL-KASEEM LITTLE
Defendant:
DONIQUE IVERY, ABU AHSAN and MARY LANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RASHID v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2014cv03910
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. RASHID
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN, ALEJANDRINA SUMICAD and RALPH WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORVAL v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2014cv03271
Plaintiff:
JEAN DORVAL
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN, IHUOMA NWACHUKWA and DONIQUE IVERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 3:2014cv02025
Plaintiff:
ALAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, DR. WOODWARD, MD, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMERO v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2013cv07695
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. ROMERO
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN and ROBIN GEHRMANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRUPP v. DR. ABU AHSAN et al
as 3:2013cv07442
Plaintiff:
OTTO KRUPP
Defendant:
DR. ABU AHSAN, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE, JANE DOE (BUROCK) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
