Cases 21 - 30 of 105
KENNEDY v. BRYANT et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barbour and Roger Wruck
Plaintiff:
Solomon S. Kennedy and Soloman S. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ingram v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Superintendent Joe Errington, Lieutenant Rita Bonner, Commissioner Pelicia E. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Ingram
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Bryant et al
as 4:2019cv00021
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Phil Bryant
Petitioner:
Tracy Lee West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Govenor Phil Bryant and State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lenard v. Bryant et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Phil Bryant
Petitioner:
Fred Lenard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale v. Arnold et al
as 3:2018cv00754
Defendant:
MTC, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
John Hale
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Supt. Emmitt L. Sparkman, Roger Wruck and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Blunt v. Weill, Sr. et al
as 3:2018cv00641
Defendant:
Barbara Dunn, Jim Hood, Brice R. White and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charlie Blunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
David Adams
Respondent:
Phil Bryant and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
David Gray
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Jim Hood, Brian Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
