Cases 21 - 30 of 151
BELL, THOMAS LLC et al v. INDIANA SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2021cv01138
Defendant:
INTAKE CLASSIFICATION SHERIFF and INDIANA SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PHILLIP BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curry v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Defendant:
Tyree L Carr, Christopher Brautzsch, Jeremy Nicodemus and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Hassel et al
as 3:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Mary Loftus, Andrew Holcomb, Tchapet and others
Plaintiff:
Jacklyn Crystal-Marie Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SPAULDING et al
as 2:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
DEREK THOMAS
Defendant:
COREY POINTER, STEPHEN SPAULDING, JOSLYN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABOUHALIMA v. LOTTS et al
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
LOTTS, BUCKLE, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
MAHMUD ABOUHALIMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BELL v. HENDRIX et al
as 1:2020cv02731
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JACK HENDRIX, DEREK CHRISTIAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN et al v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
THA DEPUTY WARDEN #2, J. E. KRUEGER, SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McQUISTON v. CARAVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv02444
Defendant:
FUEQUAY, VANSICKLE, B. LAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
DALE CONRAD McQUISTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cochran - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Diane L Berkowitz, U.S. Department of Justice, James T Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Nozick et al
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Diane L Berkowitz, U.S. Department of Justice, James T Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
