Cases 21 - 30 of 69
EDDINGS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
KWAME T. EDDINGS
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, RICHARD BOWER and SEAN M. SAMSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simon v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Sgt. Bower, Lt. Trevethan, Dr. Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01469
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL FLORES, ESMANUEL FLORES and ESMAUEL FLORES
Defendant:
ROBERT ROSE, BRUCE HERDMAN, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haight v. Harry et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow and others
Petitioner:
William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDIVNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00433
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and RICHARD BOWER
Petitioner:
JAMES W. VANDIVNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VICTOR v. FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COUNSELOR LOU, COMMISSIONER LOHR and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ARNOLD v. G.E.O. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv05407
Defendant:
TAMMY S. FERGUSON, G.E.O. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONS, CHIEF JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE A. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nottingham et al v. Harry et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Respondent:
Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow, Anthony Ciuca and others
Petitioner:
James E. Nottingham and William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CONAWAY v. LESKINEN et al
as 2:2018cv01684
Defendant:
JUDGE STEVEN LESKINEN, CAPTAIN DAVID J. RUTTER, LT. THOMAS ROLENCIK and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT DALE CONAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
