Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Cessna v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01680
Petitioner:
Anthony Cessna
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Vince Mooney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
Dunn v. Tennessee Department of Revenue et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
William Dunn
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Revenue, Putnam County Sheriff's Office, Randy Roland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00674
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Thompson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Richard Porter, Thomas Seacord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
