Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Wubneh v. General et al
as 1:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Patricia General and Armor Correctional Health Services
Plaintiff:
Muluken Wubneh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEENAN v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv01399
Plaintiff:
George W Keenan
Defendant:
Beth Cabell, Dr. Charles Campbell, Harold W Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf v. Amor Correctional Health Service$ Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Doctor Gore, Lynda Burrows, Does 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sams v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00639
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Mae Sams
Defendant:
Tasheiba L. Cumbo, Cheryl A. Kelske, S. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf, Jr v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00529
Defendant:
Doe #7, Doe #3, Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearin v. Clarke et al
as 2:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. and John Does
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00133
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ramona Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Jackson v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Luong et al
as 2:2018cv00478
Defendant:
Dr. D. Luong and Armor Correctional Health Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caudill v. Armor Correctional Health Services et al
as 1:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Caudill
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Dr. Brooks and Dr. Gore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
