Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Currie v. USA
as 5:2016cv00699
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Adriann Roshanda Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ALSTON-CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2016cv00947
Petitioner: BERNIC LEE ALSTON-CURRIE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CURRY v. USA
as 1:2016cv00516
Petitioner: MARCUS MAYHEW CURRY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CURRY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv01102
Petitioner: GREGORY CURRY
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curry v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2015hc02304
Petitioner: Gregory Curry
Respondent: United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TURNER v. CLELLAND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00947
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD TURNER, JR.
Defendant: MR. CLELLAND, CURRY, HUNEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie v. USA
as 5:2015cv00567
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Larry Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff: SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant: SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00149
Plaintiff: Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant: Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator, Charles Vance, James Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?